Junk Removal in Fulton, MS

Get matched to top-rated junk removal services

America's #1 Source for Dumpsters and Junk Removal

33235, 31497, 17502
Compare Junk Removal Quotes
CH

Coker Hauling & Disposal, LLC Guntown, MS

Fulton, MS

Looking for a locally owned dumpster rental company that’s reputable and affordable? At Coker Hauling & Disposal, LLC, we make dumpster rental simple, cost-effective, and convenient. Reach out today to learn more or to get a free junk removal quote. more

 Longhaul Junk Removal logo

Longhaul Junk Removal

Tupelo, MS

At Longhaul Junk Removal, we pride ourselves on quality, value, and top-notch service! When you contact us, you'll be given the exceptional customer service you deserve, including free quotes, up-front pricing, and no hidden fees. more

MB

McMillen Brokers LLC

New Albany, MS

McMillen Brokers LLC is an experienced construction company offering a full-service junk removal division handling everything from furniture removal to complete building cleanouts. If you need a construction site cleanup or house cleanout, give us a call today for a... more

Junk Removal Tips for Fulton, MS

Removing Unwanted Junk

What types of projects benefit from junk removal services?

Junk removal is a great solution for:

  • Pre-moveout cleanup
  • Renovation projects
  • New construction
  • Estate cleanouts
  • Furniture removal
  • Yard cleanups
  • Waste/debris removal
  • Much more!

How does the cost of dumpster rental compare to junk removal services?

The cost of renting a dumpster or for hiring a junk removal service varies based on several factors, including your location, volume of junk/debris, duration of service, and other factors. In general, junk removal services cost more than renting a dumpster because of the added labor costs involved.

The one exception to this rule is for smaller cleanups. For example, if you simply want to get rid of a couple of pieces of furniture or a handful of boxes or bags of trash, then junk removal is the more cost-effective solution.

Read more: