Top 3 Junk Removal Services in Montrose County, CO

Get matched to top-rated junk removal services

America's #1 Source for Dumpsters and Junk Removal

33049, 32636, 32060
Compare Junk Removal Quotes
WS

Western Slope Junk Removal

Montrose, CO

Our junk removal services don’t just remove your home of unwanted belongings, they help the environment as well. If we are unable to donate your items, we take every measure possible to recycle or dispose of them in the... more

MS

Madsen Services LLC

Delta, CO

Madsen Services LLC offers a wide range of services, including demolition, junk removal, cleaning services, and more. Our team is always trustworthy and upfront about the work we provide. To get a free junk removal quote, contact us today! more

GJ Roll Away Dumpster Rental and Junk Removal logo

GJ Roll Away Dumpster Rental and Junk Removal

Grand Junction, CO

Here at GJ Roll Away, we work hard everyday to provide the best of the best for our customers. We want to go above and beyond by providing not only the best quality junk removal services in Grand Junction, Colorado,... more

Junk Removal Tips for Montrose County, CO

Removing Unwanted Junk

What types of projects benefit from junk removal services?

Junk removal is a great solution for:

  • Pre-moveout cleanup
  • Renovation projects
  • New construction
  • Estate cleanouts
  • Furniture removal
  • Yard cleanups
  • Waste/debris removal
  • Much more!

How does the cost of dumpster rental compare to junk removal services?

The cost of renting a dumpster or for hiring a junk removal service varies based on several factors, including your location, volume of junk/debris, duration of service, and other factors. In general, junk removal services cost more than renting a dumpster because of the added labor costs involved.

The one exception to this rule is for smaller cleanups. For example, if you simply want to get rid of a couple of pieces of furniture or a handful of boxes or bags of trash, then junk removal is the more cost-effective solution.

Read more: